34 floors, 850 steps up...

A weblog for dropouts, ex-patriats and dreamers.
No need to load my complete blog everytime you visit here. Just take a look at http://feedly.com and get your personalized RSS reader from any browser or mobile device.
Quote from Lore Sjöberg: Creating your own blog is about as easy as creating your own urine, and you're about as likely to find someone else interested in it ;-)
Labels: PocketPC
Labels: hardware
Labels: PocketPC
There may be lots of good reasons to switch from PPC to Intel´s x86 technology (DRM included, better roadmap for the next few years, better performance per watt of power, industry standard, fear of cheap PPC-Mac clones in the form of less than 300$ game consoles from Microsoft, Sony and Nintendo,...), but as the first MacIntels are scheduled to ship in June 2006, next years WWDC would have been a perfect opportunity the announce the switch. They could have given a few key developers the information under NDA before and everything would have been smooth and easy, given the fact that Rosetta run your "old" PPC code on MacIntel quite fine. But with yesterdays announcement, who will buy a PPC Mac, if it is not absolutely needed. I guess most people will just wait for the MacIntels or switch to Intel hardware, mostly notebooks before. Apple right now makes more than fifty percent of their sales with hardware, mostly Macs, so how is their business going the next 12 months with their sales mostly relying on iPod, software and services? The only explanation, that comes to my mind, besides the possibility of Steve Jobs gone completely insane, is that Apple is prepared for sale in the next few months. Sony or Samsung might be good canditates to buy iPod and the best operating system on the market, without any legacy junk (Mac 68k and PPC) standing in the way. It´s not a really plausible idea to me, but everything else sounds just utterly mad to me...
Labels: Mac
Labels: PocketPC
Labels: Palm
In the last few months from time to time I thought about the best aspect ratio and resolution for a video playback device (formerly called TV). On the new stylish widescreen displays (16:9) standard 4:3 content is less than perfect and vice versa. Same with resolutions. A 1280*720 display is great for 720p content, but SD and even HD1080 content has to be scaled again. So what to do, and more to the point: what type of new "TV" should I buy? And which up/downscaling technology? I think I will use no scaling at all and will use a projection device to just display the native pixels of the source material. So if I have a 720*576 picture I won't use any upconverting or scaling technology to use it with a 1280*720, 1366*768, 1400*1050 or 1920*1080 projection device. I will just send the native pixels with the necessary black borders to the screen and use the optical zoom of the projector to get the picture at the right size. Next week I will start some testing...